hackajob Pricing Overview

I love the ease of use of the hackajob platform, especially with the new Agentic AI tool called Archer that seamlessly integrates into the background, finding relevant candidates for all our roles and automatically submitting them into our ATS. The original product, where I actively source candidates as a recruiter, is also very easy to use. One of the best things is the personal touch from our account managers, Nico and Niall, who constantly make tweaks, give advice, and provide suggestions. They are super responsive and very helpful, which adds a lot of value. Additionally, the initial setup was very easy; it just involved a simple integration into our ATS. I can also log in and use it directly from my browser. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think some of the network hackajob has is a bit rudimentary in some non-tech business areas as they are only just expanding their reach into other areas, but this is changing. Also, communication skills can be a concern. Hackajob relies mostly on candidate profiles and CVs, and it would be great if they could evolve to include some sort of AI assessment or candidate discussion to truly gauge communication skills, particularly English, since it's important for our business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the usability of hackajob. It is quite adaptable to the needs I have, which allows me to be as open or as narrow in my search as I want, especially when looking within tech and engineering fields. There are lots of different skills and experience backgrounds that I can search for. Additionally, I can match current live roles in my ATS and link them directly to hackajob. Hackajob uses pre-populated details from job descriptions to create a straightforward search with main skills and requirements, categorizing candidates against these criteria. Also, setting it up was very easy and linking roles to our ATS was really straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the quality of candidates is hard to really identify on paper. I've had to go through a lot more candidates on hackajob to find those that are high quality. For mid-level positions, hackajob is more ideal, but it could be improved for senior, hard-to-fill positions and for capturing the top 1 to 5% of candidate quality. I just don't think hackajob probably contains the top 1 to 5% of quality candidates out there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.